Ga. Supreme Court ruling casts pall over Cobb County funding of Braves stadium

In a ruling Monday that validated the sale of bonds for the Braves stadium, the Georgia Supreme Court said the deal “may push the law as far as it can go.” The order also raised the question of political ramifications of the transaction.

The 43-page ruling written by Justice David Nahmias concludes:

Atlanta Braves, SunTrust Park

The Georgia Supreme Court has cleared the way for Cobb County to help fund construction of the Atlanta Braves’ SunTrust Park. Credit: ballparksofbaseball.com

Cobb County Commission Chairman Tim Lee released a statement Tuesday that focused on the fact that the ruling clears the way for Cobb to issue up to $397 million in revenue bonds to help pay for the stadium’s construction.

Lee wrote in an email:

Cobb Chairman Tim Lee

Cobb Chairman Tim Lee

The court’s ruling recognized the county’s ambitions for the stadium, which were specified in an operating agreement between Cobb County and the Cobb-Marietta Coliseum and Exhibit Hall Authority.

According to the ruling, terms call for the authority to sell the bonds. The county is to pay the authority amounts necessary to cover the difference between licensing fees paid by the Braves and annual debt payments. The county agrees to pay up to $25 million a year for 30 years, with proceeds derived from the county’s hotel/motel tax, car rental tax, and general funds.

The ruling states:

Georgia Supreme Court Justice David Nahmias

Georgia Supreme Court Justice David Nahmias

The lawsuit was filed by three Cobb County residents who contended the bond validation approved by a Cobb Superior Court judge was incorrect. The appellants are Larry Savage, Richard Pellegrino, and T. Tucker Hobgood.

In its most recent rating action on the coliseum authority, in 2013, Moody’s Investors Service provided an investment grade rating of Aaa, with a stable outlook. Moody’s cited Cobb’s, “sizeable and diverse economic and employment base, a sound financial position supported by conservative fiscal management and satisfactory fund balance levels, and a low debt burden.”